Concepcion v. Warden, Glades County Detention Center (Glades)Concepcion v. Warden, Glades County Detention Center (Glades)
ORDER
Petitioner Jorge Quintero Concepcion has filed a pro se habeas corpus petition challenging his detention by U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement. (Doc. 1.)1 As best the Court can tell, he claims that his continued detention violates the Fifth Amendment as interpreted by Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001). The Government has responded in opposition. (Doc. 3.)
This is Concepcion‘s second petition. The prior case was dismissed for lack of cooperation with removal. See Case 2:26-cv-01589-KCD-NPM. Concepcion does not argue that he is now cooperating. Instead, he claims that the Government cannot remove him to a third-country. But that is wrong.
Because Concepcion‘s petition here recycles the same arguments and has not shown—or even argued—he cooperated with the removal attempt to Mexico that was the basis for the prior denial, the same result applies here. Consequently, the habeas petition is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Concepcion refiling a new petition should his current detention be unimpeded and he can demonstrate there is no significant likelihood of removal in the reasonably foreseeable future. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment accordingly, terminate any pending motions and deadlines, and close the case.
Kyle C. Dudek
United States District Judge