12 Vt. 285 | Vt. | 1840
The opinion of the court was delivered by
—The defendant’s note was dated 13th September, 1831, and due on demand, to the intestate. Administration was taken on the 4th September, 1837. The suit was commenced 18th August, 1838. Had the statute of limitations run ? The statute of limitation runs in six years after the cause of action accrues, and, as a general rule, when the statute commences running, it continues, except in a few cases mentioned in the statute. It is however insisted, that when executors or administrators are appointed, the action accrues to them only on their appointment. If this be so the statute would not run until • six years after the appointment, and, by consequence, probably, those claims on which it had run in the life time of the deceased, would not be barred.
It is also insisted, that, inasmuch as it has been held^that the death of the debtor suspends the running of the statute until he has an executor or administrator, who can be sued, so, by analogy, the death of the creditor should also suspend its operation until the administrator or executor is appointed and has reasonable time to sue. There is, however, a clear difference in these cases. When a debtor dies, his creditor has no powers either to sue or procure"an executor or administrator to be appointed, whom he can pursue. When a creditor dies, those who come in his right can take administration and sue when they please. In the present case, if we'
This decision, thus early made, settled the construction of the statute, and has ever been followed, in England. The statute -of 21 Ja. 1, was here adopted, in the same words, after such judicial construction, and that construction it must still have.
Judgment affirmed.