History
  • No items yet
midpage
Conant v. Burns
19 A. 11
| N.H. | 1889
|
Check Treatment

If the question of costs is open to revision (G. L., c. 249, s. 49; Nutter v. Varney, 64 N.H. 334) the plaintiff is not entitled to costs against the trustee. The trustee was the prevailing party. Upon his deposition he was chargeable for the board of the horse after February 28, 1887, and the jury found him chargeable for no more. The fact that by reason of the lapse of time the board amounted to a larger sum at the time of the verdict than when the deposition was given does not make the trustee chargeable with costs under G. L., c. 249, s. 26.

Exceptions overruled.

SMITH, J., did not sit: the others concurred. *Page 100

Case Details

Case Name: Conant v. Burns
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Dec 5, 1889
Citation: 19 A. 11
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.