56 Kan. 228 | Kan. | 1895
The opinion of the court was delivered by
: The plaintiff in error, as plaintiff below, brought this action against the railway company to recover damages claimed to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant's servants in the operation of its railway. The plaintiff was employed as a section-hand at Oafcley. On the 14th of September,
We think it was a question of fact, which should
The judgment is reversed, and a new trial ordered.