History
  • No items yet
midpage
Comstock v. Apthorpe
8 Cow. 386
Court for the Trial of Impeach...
1826
Check Treatment
Woodworth, J., and Savage, Oh. J.,

delivered opinions, the result of which was, that the injunction should have been dissolved by the court of chancery, in which Sutherland, J., concurred.

Golden, Senator,

delivered an opinion, in which he supported the chancellor’s decision throughout.

On the question being put, the vote stood as follows:

For affirmance, Burt, Burrows, Golden, Cramer, Dudley, Earll, Ellsworth, Gardiner, Greenly, Keyes, Lefferts, Lynde, Mallory, M’Miehael and Wright, Senators.

For afflrn>i anee 16.

*386-1For reversal, in respect to the refusal to dissolve the in junction by the court of chancery, Bowman, Bray ton, Haight, McIntyre, Morgan, Bedfield, Wilkeson, Wooster, Senators,- and Savage, .Oh. J., and Sutherland, and Wood-worth, Justices. -

reversal.

Case Details

Case Name: Comstock v. Apthorpe
Court Name: Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors
Date Published: Sep 15, 1826
Citation: 8 Cow. 386
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.