Computervision v. United States
445 F.3d 1355
Fed. Cir.
2006
Check Treatment
Docket

COMPUTERVISION CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

05-5014

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

August 30, 2006

Appealed from: United States Court of Federal Claims, Judge Marian Blank Horn

John S. Brown, Bingham McCutchen LLP, of Boston, Massachusetts, filed a petition for rehearing en banc for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the petition were George P. Mair, Donald-Bruce Abrams and Matthew D. Schnall.

Francesca U. Tamami, Attorney, Tax Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, filed a response to the petition for defendant-appellee. With her on the response were Eileen J. O‘Connor, Assistant Attorney General; Richard T. Morrison, Deputy Assistant Attorney General; Gilbert S. Rothenberg and Bruce R. Ellisen, Attorneys.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before MICHEL, Chief Judge, NEWMAN, MAYER, LOURIE, RADER, SCHALL, BRYSON, GAJARSA, LINN, DYK, and PROST, Circuit Judges.

O R D E R

A petition for rehearing en banc was filed by the Appellant, and a response thereto was invited by the court and filed by the Appellee. The petition was referred first as a petition for panel rehearing to the panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter the petition and response were referred to the circuit judges who are in regular active service.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

  1. The petition for rehearing is denied.1
  2. The petition for rehearing en banc is denied.
  3. The mandate of the court will issue on September 6, 2006.

FOR THE COURT

Aug 30 2006

Date

s/Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly

Clerk

cc: John S. Brown, Esq.

Francesca U. Tamami, Esq.

Notes

1
The merits panel issues a supplemental opinion simultaneously with this order.