History
  • No items yet
midpage
Computervision v. United States
445 F.3d 1355
| Fed. Cir. | 2006
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*2 Before MICHEL, Chief Judge, NEWMAN, MAYER, LOURIE, RADER, SCHALL, BRYSON, GAJARSA, LINN, DYK, and PROST, Circuit Judges.

O R D E R A petition for rehearing en banc was filed by the Appellant, and a response thereto was invited by the court and filed by the Appellee. The petition was referred first as a petition for panel rehearing to the panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter the petition and response were referred to the circuit judges who are in regular active service.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The petition for rehearing is denied. [1]

(2) The petition for rehearing en banc is denied.

(3) The mandate of the court will issue on September 6, 2006. *3 FOR THE COURT _Aug 30 2006 _s/Jan Horbaly____ Date Jan Horbaly

Clerk cc: John S. Brown, Esq.

Francesca U. Tamami, Esq. 2

[1] The merits panel issues a supplemental opinion simultaneously with this order.

Case Details

Case Name: Computervision v. United States
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Date Published: Aug 30, 2006
Citation: 445 F.3d 1355
Docket Number: 2005-5014
Court Abbreviation: Fed. Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.