History
  • No items yet
midpage
Compucredit Holdings Corporation v. Akanthos Capital Management, LLC
2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 21909
| 11th Cir. | 2012
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS, WILSON, PRYOR, MARTIN, and JORDAN, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT:

Case: 11-13254 Date Filed: 10/19/2012 Page: 2 of 2 The decision of the district court is affirmed by an evenly divided court.

The opinion of the panel remains vacated. United States v. Geders, 585 F.2d 1303, 1306 (5th Cir. 1978) (en banc) (“[T]he court en banc is evenly divided; therefore the judgment . . . of the district court is affirmed by operation of law.”); [1] see id. (indicating that, if district court judgment is affirmed by operation of law, the panel opinion remains vacated); see also Reshard v. Britt, 839 F.2d 1499 (11th Cir. 1988); United States v. Sigma, Int’l, Inc., 300 F.3d 1278, 1280 (11th Cir. 2002) (en banc) (noting that when panel opinions are vacated they “are officially gone,” and “are void,” and none of the statements made in them “has any remaining force and cannot be considered to express the view of this Court.”).

AFFIRMED .

[1] In Bonner v. City of Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206, 1209 (11th Cir. 1981) (en banc), we adopted as binding precedent all decisions of the former Fifth Circuit handed down before October 1, 1981. 2

Case Details

Case Name: Compucredit Holdings Corporation v. Akanthos Capital Management, LLC
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Date Published: Oct 19, 2012
Citation: 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 21909
Docket Number: 11-13254
Court Abbreviation: 11th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.