History
  • No items yet
midpage
Complitano v. Steel & Alloy Tank Co.
168 A.2d 809
N.J.
1961
Check Treatment
*301 Per Curiam.

The judgment is reversed for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Conford in the Appellate Division.

Hall and Haneman, JJ., vote to affirm the judgment for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of judge Foley.

For reversal—Chief Justice Weintraub, and Justices Jacobs, Francis, Proctor and Schettino—5.

For affirmance—Justices Hall and Haneman—2.

Case Details

Case Name: Complitano v. Steel & Alloy Tank Co.
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Mar 20, 1961
Citation: 168 A.2d 809
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.