History
  • No items yet
midpage
Comoli v. State
78 Vt. 423
Vt.
1906
Check Treatment
RowELL, C. J.

It is considered that the newly discovered evidence attached to the petition would not be likely to produce a different result on another trial.

It is also' considered that the affidavits thereto attached do- not show the requisite diligence. They state only that the affiants “used due diligence,” which is only an opinion, upon which the Court cannot act. They should have stated the facts, that the Court might judge of the matter.

Petition dismissed.

Case Details

Case Name: Comoli v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Vermont
Date Published: Feb 16, 1906
Citation: 78 Vt. 423
Court Abbreviation: Vt.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.