History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth v. Woods
495 A.2d 539
Pa.
1985
Check Treatment

*296OPINION

NIX, Chief Justice.

In this case the Commonwealth appeals the trial court’s determination that section 9712 of the Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Act, 42 Pa.C.S. § 9712, is unconstitutional. That section requires the imposition of a minimum sentence of five years total confinement if it is established by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant was in visible possession of a firearm during the commission of certain felonies.1 In light of our recent decision in Commonwealth v. Wright, 508 Pa. 25, 494 A.2d 354 (1985), we find it unnecessary to discuss at length the issues raised in this appeal.

In Commonwealth v. Wright, supra, we held that the preponderance standard of proof prescribed in section 9712 satisfies the minimum requirements of due process. Accordingly, the lower court’s holding that section 9712 is unconstitutional is reversed, the sentence imposed is vacated and the cause is remanded for resentencing pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. § 9712.

. On November 3, 1983, appellee Woods was convicted of burglary, criminal conspiracy, robbery as a felony of the first degree and possessing instruments of crime generally. He was sentenced to concurrent three (3) to ten (10) year sentences on the first three (3) counts and to a concurrent one (1) to five (5) year term on the weapons charge.

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Woods
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Jul 12, 1985
Citation: 495 A.2d 539
Docket Number: No. 73 E.D. Appeal Docket 1984
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.