History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth v. Valsalka
181 Pa. 17
Pa.
1897
Check Treatment
Per Cubiam,

We are clearly of opinion that all the assignments of error are entirely without merit. They were all considered by the learned judge of the court below in his opinion on the motions for new trial and in arrest of judgment. That opinion is a most exhaustive and elaborate treatment of all the subjects involved in the -present contention, and we are well satisfied with its reasoning and conclusions. We do not think it necessary to repeat them and we, therefore, affirm the judgment for the reasons stated in the opinion.

The judgment of the court below is affirmed, and it is ordered that the record be remitted for the purpose of execution.

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Valsalka
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Apr 19, 1897
Citation: 181 Pa. 17
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 100
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.