388 A.2d 343 | Pa. Super. Ct. | 1978
Lead Opinion
The judgment of sentence is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with Commonwealth v. McCusker, 245 Pa.Super. 402, 369 A.2d 465 (1976) (Dissenting Opinion by Spaeth, J.,), rev’d-Pa.-(No. 2850 Alloc. Dkt., Filed September 21, 1977.)
Concurrence Opinion
concurring:
This case presents the same issue as Commonwealth v. Marzik, 255 Pa.Super. 500, 388 A.2d 340 (1978). I concur for the reasons expressed in my concurring opinion in that case. See Pa.R.Crim.P. 1405(c) and 321.
Dissenting Opinion
respectfully dissents and would remand this case to the court below for a determination of whether or not appellant knowingly and intelligently waived his right to file post-trial motions. Commonwealth v. Schroth, 458 Pa. 233, 328 A.2d 168 (1974); Commonwealth v. Tate, 464 Pa. 25, 346 A.2d 1 (1975).
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting:
This case presents the same issue as Commonwealth v. Marzik, 255 Pa.Super. 500, 388 A.2d 340 (1978). I dissent for the reasons expressed in my dissenting opinion in that case.