Commonwealth v. Suggs

Jul 7, 1975
Appeal Nos. 622
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Brien

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

The Court being equally divided, the judgments of sentence are affirmed.

*90EAGEN, O’BRIEN, POMEROY, JJ., would affirm. ROBERTS, NIX, MANDERINO, JJ., would reverse the judgments of sentence and remand for a new trial. JONES, C. J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.