History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth v. Stone
264 A.2d 406
Pa.
1970
Check Treatment

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Petitioner’s counsel in the Superior Court filed no brief and has filed an inadequate petition for allowance of appeal with this Court. This is not the “representation in the role of an advocate” which we require. See Ellis v. United States, 356 U.S. 674, 675, 78 *498 S. Ct. 974, 2 L. Ed. 2d 1060 (1958); Commonwealth v. Stein, 436 Pa. 330, 260 A. 2d 467 (1969). Accordingly, the petition for allocatur is granted, the order of the Superior Court is vacated and the case remanded so that the Superior Court may consider the appeal upon the filing of a brief properly prepared by counsel.

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Stone
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Apr 16, 1970
Citation: 264 A.2d 406
Docket Number: 3082-A, Miscellaneous Docket
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.