History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth v. Stanton
244 Pa. Super. 585
Pa. Super. Ct.
1976
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Judgment of sentence affirmed.






Dissenting Opinion

WATKINS, P. J., and SPAETH, J.,

dissent for the reasons cited in the dissenting opinion in Commonwealth v. McCusker, 245 Pa.Superior Ct. -, 369 A.2d 465 (1976).

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Stanton
Court Name: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Dec 20, 1976
Citation: 244 Pa. Super. 585
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 1300
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Super. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.