History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth v. Slaughter
525 Pa. 568
| Pa. | 1990
|
Check Treatment

OPINION OF THE COURT

PAPADAKOS, Justice.

Anthony Slaughter (Appellant) was charged with an attempt “to commit the crime of theft of a Volvo automobile,” a felony of the third degree. He was tried without a jury and was found guilty. On direct appeal, a three-judge panel of the Superior Court reversed and set aside the judgment of sentence for attempted theft of an automobile and remanded for the imposition of sentence for the crime of attempted theft of the contents of the involved vehicle 390 Pa.Super. 657, 561 A.2d 822. Appellant was never charged with this crime and the Commonwealth concedes that to sentence him for such a crime clearly violates the Sixth Amendment of the Federal Constitution. We agree.

The Superior Court erred in remanding this matter for imposition of a sentence for a crime for which Appellant was neither charged nor convicted because an appellate court may not “mold” a criminal verdict as was done here. In Commonwealth v. Wagner, 486 Pa. 548, 406 A.2d 1026 (1979), our Court specifically rejected the notion that an appellate court may refashion the conviction of a jury into one based on a lesser-included offense. That precedent applies equally here.

Accordingly, the order of the Superior Court must be reversed and the Appellant discharged.

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Slaughter
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Dec 20, 1990
Citation: 525 Pa. 568
Docket Number: No. 87 Western District Appeal Docket 1989
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.