midpage

Commonwealth v. SimmonsCommonwealth v. Simmons

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Apr 29, 2014
Versions:91 A.3d 102
625 Pa. 182
2014 WL 1686533
2014 Pa. LEXIS 1112

Lead Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 29th day of April, 2014, the Order of the Superior Court is hereby AFFIRMED.

Justice STEVENS files a Concurring Statement.






Concurrence Opinion

Justice STEVENS,

concurring.

I join this Court’s per curiam affir-mance. Nevertheless, I wish to emphasize my view that the communication of threats made by a probationer to an intended victim is not a requirement to find the probationer engaged in “assaultive behavior” in violation of the general condition for special probation or parole set forth in 87 Pa.Code § 65.4(5)(iii).

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Simmons
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Apr 29, 2014
Citations: 91 A.3d 102; 625 Pa. 182; 2014 WL 1686533; 2014 Pa. LEXIS 1112
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
Log In