91 A.3d 102
Pa.
2014

Lead Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 29th day of April, 2014, the Order of the Superior Court is hereby AFFIRMED.

Justice STEVENS files a Concurring Statement.





Concurrence Opinion

Justice STEVENS,

concurring.

I join this Court’s per curiam affir-mance. Nevertheless, I wish to emphasize my view that the communication of threats made by a probationer to an intended victim is not a requirement to find the probationer engaged in “assaultive behavior” in violation of the general condition for special probation or parole set forth in 87 Pa.Code § 65.4(5)(iii).