History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth v. Simmons
91 A.3d 102
Pa.
2014
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 29th day of April, 2014, the Order of the Superior Court is hereby AFFIRMED.

Justice STEVENS files a Concurring Statement.






Concurrence Opinion

Justice STEVENS,

concurring.

I join this Court’s per curiam affir-mance. Nevertheless, I wish to emphasize my view that the communication of threats made by a probationer to an intended victim is not a requirement to find the probationer engaged in “assaultive behavior” in violation of the general condition for special probation or parole set forth in 87 Pa.Code § 65.4(5)(iii).

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Simmons
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Apr 29, 2014
Citation: 91 A.3d 102
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In