History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth v. Silk
111 Mass. 431
Mass.
1873
Check Treatment
Morton, J.

In the cross-examination of witnesses, great latitude is ordinarily allowed, to test their accuracy and credibility. But the extent to which cross-examination upon collateral matters shall be pursued is a matter within the discretion of the presiding judge. The previous difficulty between the witness Haines and the defendant was a collateral matter which the court was not required to try, and the limitation of the cross-examination of Haines, and the rejection of the testimony of Mahoney as to such difficulty, were within the discretion of the presiding judge, and not the subject of exception. Exceptions overruled.

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Silk
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: Jan 15, 1873
Citation: 111 Mass. 431
Court Abbreviation: Mass.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.