History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth v. Seeman
10 Sadler 501
Pa.
1888
Check Treatment
Per Curiam:

It is useless now to inquire whether the learned court below was right in sustaining the defendant’s motion to require the prosecution to elect upon which three counts in the indictment he would proceed; and also in sustaining the defendant’s motion to quash certain indictments. The defendant has been tried and acquitted of the precise charge set forth in the information, and that is the end of the case.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Seeman
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: May 21, 1888
Citation: 10 Sadler 501
Docket Number: No. 40
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.