History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth v. Schaeffer
652 A.2d 294
Pa.
1994
Check Treatment

*273 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The Court being equally divided, the order of the Superior Court is affirmed.

MONTEMURO, J., did not participate in the decision of these cases. NIX, C.J., and PAPADAKOS and CASTILLE, JJ., dissent and would reverse the Order of the Superior Court.

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Schaeffer
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Dec 30, 1994
Citation: 652 A.2d 294
Docket Number: Appeal No. 53 Middle District Appeal Docket 1988
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In