History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth v. Schaeffer
539 Pa. 271
Pa.
1994
Check Treatment

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The Court being equally divided, the order of the Superior Court is affirmed.

MONTEMURO, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.* FLAHERTY, ZAPPALA and CAPPY, JJ., dissent and would reverse the Order of the Superior Court and remand for a new trial.

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Schaeffer
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Dec 30, 1994
Citation: 539 Pa. 271
Docket Number: Appeal No. 63 Middle District Appeal Docket 1993
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.