History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth v. Saunders
218 Pa. Super. 183
Pa. Super. Ct.
1971
Check Treatment

Dissenting Opinion

*184Dissenting Opinion by

Hoffman, J.:

Appellant was convicted in federal district court for the armed robbery of a savings and loan institution. Subsequently, he ivas convicted by the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas for the same robbery.

This conviction raises a question identical in all relevant respects with the appeal in Commonwealth v. Mills, 217 Pa. Superior Ct. 269, 269 A. 2d 322 (1970). For the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in that case, I would vacate the judgment of sentence and discharge appellant on this charge.






Lead Opinion

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Saunders
Court Name: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Apr 15, 1971
Citation: 218 Pa. Super. 183
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 274
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Super. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.