History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth v. Santana
228 Pa. Super. 756
Pa. Super. Ct.
1973
Check Treatment

Opinion

Pee Curiam :

The six judges who heard this appeal being equally divided, the judgment of sentence is affirmed.

Hoffman, Cercone, and Spaeth, JJ., dissent. Spaulding, J., absent.

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Santana
Court Name: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Nov 21, 1973
Citation: 228 Pa. Super. 756
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 1565
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Super. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.