Commonwealth v. Rose

370 A.2d 1223 | Pa. Super. Ct. | 1977

Lead Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant contends that she has a right to have her arrest record expunged. Because it believed that it did not

*344have the authority to reach that issue, the lower court denied appellant’s petition. This Court recently held that such authority does exist. See Commonwealth v. Malone, 244 Pa.Super. 62, 366 A.2d 584 (1976). Therefore, we remand to the lower court for further consideration in light of our holding in Commonwealth v. Malone, supra.






Dissenting Opinion

PRICE and VAN der VOORT,

JJ.-, dissent for the reasons stated in the Dissenting Opinion in Commonwealth v. Malone, supra.

midpage