History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth v. Rose
246 Pa. Super. 343
Pa. Super. Ct.
1977
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant contends that she has a right to have her arrest record expunged. Because it believed that it did not

*344have the authority to reach that issue, the lower court denied appellant’s petition. This Court recently held that such authority does exist. See Commonwealth v. Malone, 244 Pa.Super. 62, 366 A.2d 584 (1976). Therefore, we remand to the lower court for further consideration in light of our holding in Commonwealth v. Malone, supra.






Dissenting Opinion

PRICE and VAN der VOORT,

JJ.-, dissent for the reasons stated in the Dissenting Opinion in Commonwealth v. Malone, supra.

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Rose
Court Name: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Mar 3, 1977
Citation: 246 Pa. Super. 343
Docket Number: No. 2128
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Super. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.