Commonwealth v. Reiss

672 A.2d 784 | Pa. | 1996

*480 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The court being evenly divided, the order of the Superior Court is affirmed.

NIX, C. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case. FLAHERTY, ZAPPALA and NIGRO, JJ., would reverse the order of the Superior Court.
midpage