History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth v. Reiss
543 Pa. 479
Pa.
1996
Check Treatment

*480 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The court being evenly divided, the order of the Superior Court is affirmed.

NIX, C. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case. FLAHERTY, ZAPPALA and NIGRO, JJ., would reverse the order of the Superior Court.

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Reiss
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Mar 18, 1996
Citation: 543 Pa. 479
Docket Number: Appeal No. 70 Middle District Appeal Docket 1995
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.