History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth v. Reed, T.
135 A.3d 177
| Pa. | 2016
|
Check Treatment

*1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 557 WAL 2014

:

Respondent : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court :

v. :

:

:

THOMAS M. REED, :

:

Petitioner :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 22 nd day of April, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED . The issues, rephrased for clarity, are:

1) Are the recent SORNA statutes (42 Pa.C.S. §§9799.10, 9799.13 and 9799.14 and related provisions) punitive in nature and do they violate the ex post facto provisions of the Pennsylvania Constitution?

2) Do the SORNA statutes violate fundamental due process under the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 9 of the Pennsylvania Constitution?

3) Do the SORNA statutes violate the separation of powers doctrine under the Pennsylvania Constitution?

4) Was lifetime Megan’s Law registration not part of petitioner’s original guilty plea, and therefore, should petitioner’s original plea, which only called for a ten-year Megan’s Law requirement, be enforced?

T he Prothonotary is directed to schedule briefing and argument in this matter together with the following matters presenting related issues: Commonwealth v. Gilbert , 181 MAL 2015 and Commonwealth v. Muniz , 684 MAL 2015.

[557 WAL 2014] - 2

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Reed, T.
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Apr 22, 2016
Citation: 135 A.3d 177
Docket Number: 557 WAL 2014 (Granted)
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.