History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth v. Rafferty
133 Mass. 574
Mass.
1882
Check Treatment
C. Allen, J.

Under the Pub. Sts. c. 214, § 12,* when acts apparently criminal have been proved in support of an indictment, and the defendant relies upon a license as a justification, the duty rests on him of proving a license which is broad enough to authorize the particular acts complained of. It is not sufficient for him to make it appear that he held some license; he must prove a license which is sufficient for his justification. . Exceptions overruled.

“In all criminal prosecutions in which the defendant relies for Ms justification upon any license, appointment or authority, he shall prove the same; and, until such proof, the presumption shall be that he is not so authorized.”

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Rafferty
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: Nov 28, 1882
Citation: 133 Mass. 574
Court Abbreviation: Mass.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.