History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth v. Ostrum
1918 Pa. Super. LEXIS 283
Pa. Super. Ct.
1918
Check Treatment
Per Curiam,

The relation established by the prosecutor and the defendant subsequent to their admitted engagement to marry, was the sole question in controversy in the court below, and this was submitted in a charge that was free from reversible error. Its sufficiency on the question of reasonable doubt has been settled by the Supreme Court in Com. v. Berney, No. 181, January Term, 1918, filed July 17, 1918.

The judgment is affirmed, and it is ordered that the appellant appear in the court below at such time as he may be there called, and that he be by that court committed until he has complied with the sentence or any part of it that has not been performed at the time this appeal became a supersedeas,

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Ostrum
Court Name: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Dec 12, 1918
Citation: 1918 Pa. Super. LEXIS 283
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 404
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Super. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.