History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth v. Odenwalt
217 Pa. Super. 763
Pa. Super. Ct.
1970
Check Treatment

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The record is remanded to the court below with directions to hold a full evidentiary hearing on the circumstances of appellant’s failure to file post-trial motions. If the lower court shall find that appellant did knowingly and intelligently waive his right to file post-trial motions, it shall enter an order to that effect. If the court should find that he did not understandingly and intelligently waive Ms right to file post-trial motions, it shall permit appellant to file such motions mine pro tunc. If such motions are denied, it shall permit appellant to file an appeal nunc pro tunc from the judgment of sentence. Commonwealth v. Grillo, 208 Pa. Superior Ct. 444, 222 A. 2d 427 (1966).

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Odenwalt
Court Name: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Aug 6, 1970
Citation: 217 Pa. Super. 763
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 1079
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Super. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.