History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth v. Moran
17 A.3d 918
Pa.
2011
Check Treatment

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 13th day of April 2011, the Petition for Alowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioner, are:

(1) Did the trial judge abuse his discretion in refusing to grant petitioner’s request that the jury be instructed that petitioner cannot be convicted of bribery unless the Commonwealth proves that petitioner acted with criminal intent? Could such an error be harmless in a case where the sole issue was whether petitioner acted with criminal intent?
(2) Was the evidence sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that petitioner was guilty of bribery under 18 Pa.C.S. § 4701 in the respect that there was inadequate proof that petitioner acted with criminal intent?

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Moran
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Apr 13, 2011
Citation: 17 A.3d 918
Docket Number: 818 MAL 2010
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In