Commonwealth v. MAYBERRY

Jul 2, 1973
Appeals, 60 to 62
Versions:306 A.2d 294
453 Pa. 619
1973 Pa. LEXIS 719

Lead Opinion

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The judgments of contempt are affirmed.





Dissenting Opinion

Dissenting Opinion by

Mr. Justice Manderino :

I dissent because the defendants were entitled to a jury trial. See United States v. Seale, 461 F. 2d 345 (7th Cir. 1972); Commonwealth v. Patterson, 452 Pa. 457, 308 A. 2d 90 (1973) (Manderino, J., dissenting).