Brougher, Appellant, v. Schenck et al.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
July 2, 1973
452 Pa. 619
Argued May 26, 1972
William H. Neff, Jr., with him D. Reed Anderson, and Stock and Leader, for appellant.
Eugene R. Campbell and G. Franklin Rothwell, with them Daniel K. Medill, Paul C. McCleary, Jr., Fluhrer, Medill & Shelley, Smith & McCleary, and Sughrue, Rothwell, Mion, Zinn & Macpeak, for appellees.
OPINION PER CURIAM, July 2, 1973:
Decree affirmed. Costs on the appellant.
Mr. Justice ROBERTS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Commonwealth v. Mayberry et al., Appellants.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
July 2, 1973
452 Pa. 620
Argued April 24, 1973
John J. Dean, Assistant Public Defender, with him George H. Ross, Public Defender, for appellants.
J. Kent Culley, Assistant District Attorney, with him Robert L. Eberhardt, Assistant District Attorney, and Robert W. Duggan, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.
OPINION PER CURIAM, July 2, 1973:
The judgments of contempt are affirmed.
DISSENTING OPINION BY MR. JUSTICE MANDERINO:
I dissent because the defendants were entitled to a jury trial. See United States v. Seale, 461 F. 2d 345 (7th Cir. 1972); Commonwealth v. Patterson, 452 Pa. 457, 308 A. 2d 90 (1973) (MANDERINO, J., dissenting).