midpage

Commonwealth v. MackayCommonwealth v. Mackay

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Jan 2, 1901
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Hammond
Hammond, J.

Both in the popular and legal sense, the word “ lottery ” signifies a scheme for the distribution of prizes by chance. Cent. Diet. “Lottery.” Bouvier’s Law Diet. “Lottery.”

Pub. Sts. c. 209, § 1, forbids the setting up of a lottery for money, or other thing of value, and while the complaint may be defective in form in not saying that the lottery was for money or other thing of value, Commonwealth v. Horton, 2 Gray, 69, the term is broad enough to include such a lottery, and, after trial and conviction, it is to be assumed that the evidence warranted a conviction of setting up an illegal lottery within the terms of the statute. Such an offence was witiiin the jurisdiction of the court.

The defendant, having gone to trial upon the defective complaint, cannot now take advantage of the defect by motion in arrest of judgment. Pub. Sts. c. 214, § 27. For further legislation as to lotteries, see St. 1892, c. 409 ; St. 1895, c. 419, §§ 1, 2, 3, 8, 9.

Motion in arrest of judgment overruled.

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Mackay
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: Jan 2, 1901
Citations: 58 N.E. 1027; 177 Mass. 345; 1901 Mass. LEXIS 643
Court Abbreviation: Mass.
Log In