History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth v. Kelley
165 Mass. 175
Mass.
1896
Check Treatment
Field, C. J.

No exception was taken at the time to the remarks of the presiding justice to the jury when they came into court to receive further instructions, and the defendant is not entitled as of right to have his objections to the remarks considered, although exceptions might have been taken on a motion for a new trial if the motion had been denied. Kullberg v. O'Donnell, 158 Mass. 405. However, exceptions having been allowed, we have examined them, and we see no error of law in what was done and said by the justice presiding at the trial.

Exceptions overruled.

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Kelley
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: Jan 4, 1896
Citation: 165 Mass. 175
Court Abbreviation: Mass.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.