Commonwealth v. Johnson, Appeal No. 128 E.D. Appeal Dkt. 1991

Appeal No. 128 E.D. Appeal Dkt. 1991 | Pa. | Sep 21, 1992

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s assertions regarding suppression of evidence and insufficiency of the evidence are without merit. Similarly, for the reasons stated in Commonwealth v. Corporan, — Pa. -, 613 A.2d 530" court="Pa." date_filed="1992-06-17" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/commonwealth-v-corporan-2382978?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="2382978">613 A.2d 530 (1992), appellant’s assertions regarding application of the mandatory sentencing provision, 18 Pa.C.S. § 7508(a)(3), are without merit. Judgment of sentence affirmed.

NIX, C.J., and LARSEN and McDERMOTT, JJ., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.