History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth v. Jennings
256 Pa. Super. 528
Pa. Super. Ct.
1978
Check Treatment

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

SPAETH, J., concurred in the result. HOFFMAN, J., dissents because he believes the evidence insufficient to show concealment. 18 Pa.C.S. § 6106(a). WATKINS, former P. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Jennings
Court Name: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: May 5, 1978
Citation: 256 Pa. Super. 528
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 46
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Super. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.