midpage

Commonwealth v. JamesCommonwealth v. James

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Apr 28, 1977
Appeal No. 602
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Brien

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

The Court being equally divided, the judgments of sentence are affirmed.

EAGEN, C. J., and O’BRIEN and POMEROY, JJ., would affirm the judgments of sentence. ROBERTS, NIX and MANDERINO, JJ., would reverse the judgments of sentence and grant a new trial.

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. James
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Apr 28, 1977
Citations: 368 A.2d 271; 470 Pa. 217; 1977 Pa. LEXIS 509; Appeal No. 602
Docket Number: Appeal No. 602
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
Log In