Commonwealth v. James
368 A.2d 271
| Pa. | 1977

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

The Court being equally divided, the judgments of sentence are affirmed.

EAGEN, C. J., and O’BRIEN and POMEROY, JJ., would affirm the judgments of sentence. ROBERTS, NIX and MANDERINO, JJ., would reverse the judgments of sentence and grant a new trial.