Commonwealth v. James

368 A.2d 271 | Pa. | 1977

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

The Court being equally divided, the judgments of sentence are affirmed.

EAGEN, C. J., and O’BRIEN and POMEROY, JJ., would affirm the judgments of sentence. ROBERTS, NIX and MANDERINO, JJ., would reverse the judgments of sentence and grant a new trial.

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. James

Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date Published: Apr 28, 1977

Citation: 368 A.2d 271

Docket Number: Appeal No. 602

Court Abbreviation: Pa.