History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth v. James
450 Pa. 52
Pa.
1972
Check Treatment

Opinion

per Curiam,

Judgment of sentence affirmed. See, Commonwealth v. Ponton, 450 Pa. 40, 299 A. 2d 634 (1972).

Mr. Justice O’Brien, Mr. Justice Roberts and Mr. Justice Nix dissent for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice O’Brien’s dissenting opinion in Commonwealth v. Ponton, 450 Pa. 40, 299 A. 2d 634 (1972).

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. James
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Nov 30, 1972
Citation: 450 Pa. 52
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 174
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.