History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth v. Howard
149 Pa. 302
Pa.
1892
Check Treatment
Per. Curiam,

There was no final judgment in this case. The order of the court below was: “ Stated case is quashed, and new trial granted.” We are of opinion that the-case stated was properly quashed, for the reason that it failed to disclose facts necessary to an intelligent judgment. It ought to be understood that the court cannot go outside of the case stated for its facts, nor can it assume them by way of inference. The case stated having been quashed, the action in the court below stood precisely as if no case stated had been agreed upon.'

The judgment is affirmed, and a procedendo awarded.

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Howard
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: May 23, 1892
Citation: 149 Pa. 302
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 182
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.