midpage

Commonwealth v. HineCommonwealth v. Hine

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Oct 30, 1905
Appeal, No. 216
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Biiown
Per Curiam,

The single assignment of error is ‍‌​​​​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌‍that the court below abused its discretion in refusing a new trial. There is ‍‌​​​​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌‍nothing in the case that justifies such a charge or that even requires discussion.

*100The ‍‌​​​​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌‍judgment is affirmed and the record remitted that the sentence may be executed ‍‌​​​​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌‍in accordance with law.

Per Curiam,

October 80, 1905 :

Rule for new trial under Act of ‍‌​​​​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌‍April 22, 1903, P. L. 245, refused.

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Hine
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Oct 30, 1905
Citations: 62 A. 369; 213 Pa. 97; 1905 Pa. LEXIS 379; Appeal, No. 216
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 216
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
Log In