Commonwealth v. Hine

Oct 30, 1905

Appeal, No. 216

Versions:62 A. 369

213 Pa. 97

1905 Pa. LEXIS 379

Per Curiam,

The single assignment of error is that the court below abused its discretion in refusing a new trial. There is nothing in the case that justifies such a charge or that even requires discussion.

*100The judgment is affirmed and the record remitted that the sentence may be executed in accordance with law.

Per Curiam,

October 80, 1905 :

Rule for new trial under Act of April 22, 1903, P. L. 245, refused.