History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth v. Hine
213 Pa. 97
Pa.
1905
Check Treatment
Per Curiam,

The single assignment of error is that the court below abused its discretion in refusing a new trial. There is nothing in the case that justifies such a charge or that even requires discussion.

*100The judgment is affirmed and the record remitted that the sentence may be executed in accordance with law.

Per Curiam,

October 80, 1905 :

Rule for new trial under Act of April 22, 1903, P. L. 245, refused.

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Hine
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Oct 30, 1905
Citation: 213 Pa. 97
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 216
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.