midpage

Commonwealth v. HatfieldCommonwealth v. Hatfield

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Aug 3, 1993
No. 93 M.D. Appeal Docket 1991
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Consideration

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 3rd day of August, ‍‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​​​​​‍1993, Appellant’s Application for Reargument is granted.

NIX, C.J., and FLAHERTY, J., dissent. LARSEN and McDERMOTT, JJ., did ‍‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​​​​​‍not participate in the decision of this matter.

*256 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This court having been advised that Appellee, Steven ‍‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​​​​​‍Hatfield, is deceased, the Motion to Dismiss for Mootness is GRANTED and the Application to Proceed ‍‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​​​​​‍with Reargument pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 502(a) and Petition to Vacate Orders Below are DENIED.

LARSEN, J., did not participate ‍‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​​​​​‍in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Hatfield
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Aug 3, 1993
Citations: 628 A.2d 840; 534 Pa. 255; 1993 Pa. LEXIS 174; No. 93 M.D. Appeal Docket 1991
Docket Number: No. 93 M.D. Appeal Docket 1991
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
Log In