History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth v. Hatfield
534 Pa. 255
Pa.
1993
Check Treatment

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 3rd day of August, 1993, Appellant’s Application for Reargument is granted.

NIX, C.J., and FLAHERTY, J., dissent. LARSEN and McDERMOTT, JJ., did not participate in the decision of this matter.

*256 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This court having been advised that Appellee, Steven Hatfield, is deceased, the Motion to Dismiss for Mootness is GRANTED and the Application to Proceed with Reargument pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 502(a) and Petition to Vacate Orders Below are DENIED.

LARSEN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Hatfield
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Aug 3, 1993
Citation: 534 Pa. 255
Docket Number: No. 93 M.D. Appeal Docket 1991
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.