ORDER
The petition for allowance of appeal is granted. The order of the Superior Court,
The panel in
Towns
rejected this argument as “specious”. The court held that the statutory language clearly focuses on the defendant’s status at the time of sentencing; if, at the time of sentencing, the defendant has previously been convicted, it matters not in what sequence the arrests or other events occurred. Judgment of sentence was affirmed by
per curiam
order. Although the panel decision in
Towns
was supported by an unpublished memorandum, which of itself could not have been cited as precedential, our
per curiam
affirmance constituted a binding decision of precedential authority on the question presented to and accepted for review by this Court.
See Clarke v. Western Assurance Co.,
