History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth v. Gorman
82 Mass. 601
| Mass. | 1860
|
Check Treatment
Metcalf, J.

As there is no motion in arrest of judgment, we do not decide whether the complaint is sufficient to sustain the conviction. It was a matter of discretion with the judge whether he would dismiss the complaint, and his refusal so to do is not a legal ground of exception.

The testimony of the clerk of the town of Medway was legally admissible for the purpose for which it was admitted.

Exceptions overruled.

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Gorman
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: Nov 15, 1860
Citation: 82 Mass. 601
Court Abbreviation: Mass.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.