midpage

Commonwealth v. GilesCommonwealth v. Giles

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jul 7, 1975
Appeal Nos. 457 and 516
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Brien

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

The ‍‌​​‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌​​‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​‍Court being equally divided, the judgment of sentence is affirmed.

JONES, ‍‌​​‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌​​‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​‍EAGEN and O’BRIEN, JJ., would affirm. ROBERTS, NIX and MANDERINO, JJ., ‍‌​​‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌​​‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​‍would reverse the judgment of sentence and remand for ‍‌​​‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌​​‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​‍a new trial. *89POMEROY, J., did not participate in the consideration ‍‌​​‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌​​‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​‍or decision of this case.

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Giles
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Jul 7, 1975
Citations: 343 A.2d 355; 463 Pa. 88; 1975 Pa. LEXIS 923; Appeal Nos. 457 and 516
Docket Number: Appeal Nos. 457 and 516
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
Log In