Commonwealth v. Giles

343 A.2d 355 | Pa. | 1975

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

The Court being equally divided, the judgment of sentence is affirmed.

JONES, EAGEN and O’BRIEN, JJ., would affirm. ROBERTS, NIX and MANDERINO, JJ., would reverse the judgment of sentence and remand for a new trial. POMEROY, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Giles

Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date Published: Jul 7, 1975

Citation: 343 A.2d 355

Docket Number: Appeal Nos. 457 and 516

Court Abbreviation: Pa.