History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth v. Giles
343 A.2d 355
Pa.
1975
Check Treatment

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

The Court being equally divided, the judgment of sentence is affirmed.

JONES, EAGEN and O’BRIEN, JJ., would affirm. ROBERTS, NIX and MANDERINO, JJ., would reverse the judgment of sentence and remand for a new trial. *89POMEROY, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Giles
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Jul 7, 1975
Citation: 343 A.2d 355
Docket Number: Appeal Nos. 457 and 516
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.