History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth v. George
13 Pa. Super. 542
Pa. Super. Ct.
1900
Check Treatment
Per Curiam,

The first assignment of error cannot be sustained. The court is not bound to entertain a motion to direct a verdict of acquittal until the conclusion of all the testimony. The second assignment raises the question as to the sufficiency of the testimony to warrant a conviction. After a careful consideration of the evidence we are not convinced that the court committed error in submitting the question to the jury.

The judgment is affirmed and the record is remitted to the court below .to the end that the sentence be fully carried into -effect.

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. George
Court Name: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: May 24, 1900
Citation: 13 Pa. Super. 542
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 84
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Super. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.