History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth v. Duprey
180 Mass. 523
| Mass. | 1902
|
Check Treatment
Holmes, C. J.

The prescription was found in the defendant’s possession along with others, seemingly filed in the regular course of business, and marked in a different handwriting with a date which might be inferred to be the date of its reception. We cannot say that the jury were not warranted in drawing the further inference that it had been filled. Most prescriptions are, and it might be thought that otherwise it would not have been retained.

Exceptions overruled.

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Duprey
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: Feb 27, 1902
Citation: 180 Mass. 523
Court Abbreviation: Mass.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.