History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth v. Downing
70 Mass. 29
Mass.
1855
Check Treatment
Thomas, J.

The record appears to be duly attested. It need not bear a seal, nor is it the practice to affix one.

The witness Barnard King was not an accomplice. This *31point was settled in Commonwealth v. Willard, 22 Pick. 476. The comments of the presiding judge upon the weight to be given to his testimony are not matter of legal exception.

But we do not wish to be understood as expressing any concurrence with the remarks of the presiding judge. We think he might well have instructed the jury that such testimony was to be received with the greatest caution and distrust.

Exceptions overruled.

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Downing
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: Sep 15, 1855
Citation: 70 Mass. 29
Court Abbreviation: Mass.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.