History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth v. Davis
286 Pa. Super. 479
Pa. Super. Ct.
1981
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM:

Appellant’s claims that the court below erred 1) in refusing to sever counts 14, 15 and 16 from counts 23 and 24 and from counts 19, 20, 21 and 22, trial on all of which was on the same day; and 2) in refusing to sever counts 4 and 5 from counts 6 and 7, which four counts were tied together in another single proceeding, were not raised below in written post-verdict motions and, therefore, are not preserved for appellate review. Pa.R.Crim.P. 1123(a); Commonwealth v. Blair, 460 Pa. 31, 33 n. 1, 331 A.2d 213, 215 n. 1 (1975). The opinion of the court below adequately disposes of appellant’s remaining contentions.

The judgment of sentence is affirmed on the able (and extremely well organized) opinion of Judge Lewis of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County.

SPAETH and WICKERSHAM, JJ., concur in the result.

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Davis
Court Name: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Jul 10, 1981
Citation: 286 Pa. Super. 479
Docket Number: No. 267
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Super. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.