History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth v. Davis
810 A.2d 634
Pa.
2002
Check Treatment

Gregory WILSON, Appellant, v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION PAROLE, Appellee.

No. 48 WAP 2002.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Nov. 8, 2002.

810 A.2d 113

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 8th day of November, 2002, probable jurisdiction is noted and the order appealed is affirmed.

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Wayne DAVIS, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Nov. 12, 2002.

810 A.2d 634

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 12th day of November, 2002, we GRANT the Petition for Allowance of Appeal and we REVERSE the Order of the Superior Court. See

Commonwealth v. Eller, 807 A.2d 838 (Pa.2002).

Justice NIGRO files a dissenting statement.

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Wayne DAVIS, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Nov. 12, 2002.

810 A.2d 634

Justice NIGRO, dissenting.

I respectfully dissent from the Court‘s per curiam order reversing the instant matter for the reasons set forth in my concurring and dissenting opinion in

Commonwealth v. Eller, 807 A.2d 838 (Pa.2002).

DORAL II CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, Appellee, v. PENNSYLVANIA HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued Oct. 23, 2002. Decided Nov. 13, 2002.

810 A.2d 634

Nancy L. Gippert, Lisa Jo Fanelli-Greer, Elisabeth S. Shuster, Harrisburg, for Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission.

Terry L. McCallum, Philadelphia, for Doral II Condominium Association.

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Davis
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Nov 12, 2002
Citation: 810 A.2d 634
Docket Number: Petition 483 EAL 2001
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In