Commonwealth v. Davidson, 871 A.2d 185

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 15th day of March 2005, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, limited to the following questions:

Whether 18 Pa.C.S. § 6312(d) is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad?

Did the General Assembly intend that a person charged under 18 Pa.C.S. § 6312(d) be subjected to individual counts for each piece of child pornography possessed?

If the General Assembly so intended, is it constitutional to impose separate punishments for each conviction?

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Davidson

Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date Published: Mar 15, 2005

Citations: 871 A.2d 185; 582 Pa. 356; 2005 Pa. LEXIS 446; Appeal 1090 MAL 2004

Docket Number: Appeal 1090 MAL 2004

Court Abbreviation: Pa.