History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth v. Connolly
89 Pa. Super. 243
Pa. Super. Ct.
1926
Check Treatment

Argued November 16, 1926. This appeal involves only the same questions which have been considered in opinions this day filed in the cases of Commonwealth v. Hunsinger and Commonwealth v. Dabbiero, and for the reasons in those opinions stated, the assignments of error are overruled.

The judgment is affirmed and the record remitted to the court below, and it is ordered that the defendant appear in the court below at such time as he may be there called, and that he be by that court committed until he has complied with the sentence, or any part of it, which had not been performed at the time the appeal in this case was made a supersedeas. *Page 244

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Connolly
Court Name: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Nov 16, 1926
Citation: 89 Pa. Super. 243
Docket Number: Appeal 175
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Super. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.